Commentary for Bava Kamma 114:2
ואי ס"ד לסטים מזויין גנב הוא נמצא בשומר שכר משלם תשלומי כפל בטוען טענת לסטים מזויין
it does not follow that you can say the same in the case of the paid bailee who does not pay double payment.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 332, n. 3. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> Now if you assume that an armed malefactor is considered a thief,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 332, n. 9. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 114:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.